Look Who's Talking

The one who accuses someone of being a BLIND FOLLOWER is often the one who is blind to who he is following.

The one who accuses one of IMPOSING one's faith begins to impose his.

When you hear of INFORMED CHOICE, you know the information he has chosen.

ACCESSIBLE means "you are on your own, kid. Just do it."

If someone says "you are HOLIER than thou", don't get mad, he/she is only saying she/he is "more enlightened than you".

When you hear "BIGOT", it is shouting "just accept me".

"ADVOCACY", hey, it is about me, my needs, my preference, my choice.

When someone says "you are NOT ATTUNED TO THE TIMES", he is saying, "don't rock the boat. I am presently not ready to change my lifestyle".

So when someone talks about their CONSCIENCE, I need no convincing, I have already justified myself.

SPIRITUAL but not religious.... I am copping out.

The one who accuses another of being a DICTATOR simply wants to do the dicdating.

When someone calls an idea "HILARIOUS", a reflex reaction when "the truth hurts".

The NARROWEST viewpoint is the one that has to cover lies.

Religious FANATIC, so accuses the Darwinist fanatic. Then, there go the environmental fanatic, socialist fanatic, population control fanatic standimg aghast as someone outrightly declares being a Bieber fanatic.

If you have been called a "HYPOCRITE", don't worry, you both are. So am I.

The biggest LOSER in a battle is the one who doesn't even know he/she is in one.